Fisheries and Seafood Scheme 2026: Up to £750,000 for England Seafood and Coastal Projects
The Marine Management Organisation’s Fisheries and Seafood Scheme supports eligible England-based seafood, fishing, aquaculture, research, public-sector and marine-environment projects, with an upcoming 4 September 2026 funding-round deadline for larger applications.
Fisheries and Seafood Scheme 2026: Up to £750,000 for England Seafood and Coastal Projects
The Fisheries and Seafood Scheme (FaSS) is an England-only grant programme for projects that strengthen the seafood sector, support coastal communities, improve environmental performance, or develop the skills and infrastructure around fishing, aquaculture and seafood processing. It is administered by the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), and funded through the Fishing and Coastal Growth Fund.
The scheme is currently open to applications. Its published rules say that an applicant can receive up to £750,000 of grant per year across eligible measures, although the maximum is not an automatic award and does not mean every project can request that amount. Applications with a grant value of £250,000 or more are handled through competitive funding rounds. The next listed submission date for that panel route is 4 September 2026, followed by another round on 13 November 2026. Smaller projects use the ordinary FaSS application route and should follow the project-specific guidance rather than treating 4 September as a universal closing date.
This guide is for an organisation, business, researcher, public body, community-linked port, new entrant or unemployed person considering whether a project is a credible FaSS fit. It focuses on the information published by MMO and Defra for the current scheme and its 2026 funding rounds. Read the latest official guidance before committing money or beginning work: the exact match-funding rate, eligible cost rules and evidence requirements vary by measure.
Key details
| Detail | Confirmed information |
|---|---|
| Opportunity | Fisheries and Seafood Scheme (FaSS) |
| Administrator | Marine Management Organisation, for Defra |
| Geographic scope | England; organisations and/or vessels must be registered in England |
| Funding | Up to £750,000 grant per applicant per year for eligible measures |
| Competitive route | Grant applications of £250,000 or more are considered by a funding-round panel |
| Next listed large-project deadline | 4 September 2026 |
| Following listed round | 13 November 2026 |
| Main project themes | Workforce, community partnerships, infrastructure, sustainability, environmental recovery and diversification |
| Match funding | Required; rate depends on the relevant measure and guidance |
| Application route | FaSS online e-system; an optional expression of interest is available |
| Official contact | [email protected]; 0208 026 5539 |
What the Fisheries and Seafood Scheme can support
FaSS is not a general business-start-up grant. The central test is whether the proposal makes a clear contribution to a sustainable, resilient and prosperous seafood sector in England and would not be possible without government support. MMO lists four broad aims: creating a sustainable and resilient seafood sector; reducing emissions and waste; cleaning up rivers, lakes and seas while supporting nature recovery; and boosting regional and economic growth within seafood.
The scheme is organised into eligibility measures. Depending on the project, these include sustainable aquaculture development, improving the value and quality of fisheries products, improving infrastructure across the supply chain, marketing, processing, advisory services, skills and networking, support for new entrants, co-operative activity, partnerships between fishers and scientists, energy efficiency and climate mitigation, onboard health and safety, marine litter, conservation measures, biodiversity restoration, and diversification into new forms of income.
The funding-round page groups larger projects under three priorities: labour and workforce development, community partnerships, and infrastructure. Labour and workforce applications can use measures for skills, knowledge and networking, aquaculture training, or new entrants. Community-partnership projects can involve advisory services, co-operatives, supply-chain infrastructure, marketing, or partnerships between fishers and scientists. Infrastructure projects can cover aquaculture, product value and quality, supply-chain infrastructure, marketing, and processing. A proposal must still follow the detailed rules for the particular measure; selecting a broad theme does not make every cost eligible.
Who can apply
MMO lists a wider applicant pool than a typical fisheries business grant. Eligible applicants can include an individual or business directly engaged in commercial sea fishing, aquaculture or processing; an organisation or business directly engaged in recreational sea fishing; and an organisation or business involved in conservation, enhancement or restoration of the marine environment.
The scheme can also consider organisations that directly recycle or upcycle waste associated with the seafood sector, or that develop technologies to improve environmental sustainability in that sector. Public bodies and local authorities in communities focused on fishing, aquaculture or processing can apply, including trust ports and local-authority ports where the funds are for environmental improvements or fisheries management. Universities and research institutes are named as eligible applicant types.
There is also a route for a new entrant to the industry or an unemployed individual who would benefit from knowledge or skills in fishing, aquaculture or processing activities. That does not mean a person can request unrestricted living support. The application must connect the proposed activity to an eligible measure and demonstrate the relevant sector benefit.
The England requirement matters. The general guidance says the scheme is available to applicants whose organisation and/or vessels are registered in England. The opportunity is not a UK-wide call simply because it is published on GOV.UK. Applicants based in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland should look for the scheme administrator in their own nation. An otherwise strong project can fail if its organisational registration, vessel status, delivery location or sector benefit does not fit England.
The 2026 funding-round timeline
FaSS remains open for applications, but the competitive route for larger projects operates to published submission dates. The 2026 funding-round page lists 1 May, 12 June, 4 September and 13 November as the year-one submission dates. The next practical deadline from today is 4 September 2026. The page says the appraisal period after submission is expected to take 8 to 12 weeks before a panel meeting and decision.
The 4 September date is most relevant when the requested grant is £250,000 or more and the proposal fits the round priorities. It is not a reason to delay a smaller eligible application until that date, nor is it safe to assume that a small project can use the large-project panel form. Confirm the correct route with the MMO Grants Team if the project combines several measures or sits near the £250,000 threshold.
The ordinary application process also has its own timing. MMO says it will write within 12 weeks after an application has been receipted to say whether it has been successful, although requests for more information can extend the practical process. An application is only receipted when the information and documents required for assessment have been provided. Starting after receipt is possible, but starting before an acknowledgement of receipt is risky because costs purchased earlier can be ineligible. If you proceed while waiting, you do so at your own risk.
How to shape a fundable project
Start with the sector problem, not with a shopping list. Explain what is failing or what opportunity cannot be pursued without public support, then connect the proposed activity to a FaSS measure. For example, a skills project might address a documented recruitment or retention problem; a processing project might improve product value and quality; a marine-environment project might remove litter or restore biodiversity; and a port or supply-chain project might serve multiple users rather than only improving one private asset.
MMO asks applicants to describe the benefits of the project and, where possible, quantify them. Benefits may be social or cultural, economic, or environmental. The application should say what will happen without funding, what will happen with funding, who benefits, how many businesses or organisations are affected, and how long the benefit is expected to last. A credible baseline is more useful than an impressive but unsupported forecast.
For a larger competitive bid, make the delivery model easy to test. Name the delivery partners, clarify who owns each task, show the procurement or supplier route, identify permissions and safety requirements, and give a realistic sequence from award to completion. If several ports, fishers, researchers or community organisations benefit, explain how they were involved in designing the project and how their participation will be maintained.
Keep the scope proportionate to the award. A project requesting hundreds of thousands of pounds should not read like a short equipment purchase with a thin paragraph about regional impact. Conversely, a small measure should not promise a national transformation. The panel will be looking for value for money, benefits, affordability and deliverability, which MMO identifies as minimum assessment considerations.
Match funding, cash flow and eligible costs
FaSS requires match funding. The applicable percentage is set by the relevant guidance note, so applicants should not copy a rate from an old call, another measure or an aggregator article. Identify the source of the match, confirm whether it is cash or another permitted contribution, and show when it will be available. If partners are contributing resources, document the basis and ownership of those contributions.
Cash flow deserves special attention. MMO says that a successful applicant must be able to pay for the entire project up front and then claim the costs back. That makes working capital part of the feasibility test. A proposal can be technically eligible and still be impractical if the applicant cannot bridge the period between paying suppliers and receiving grant reimbursement.
The scheme excludes a long list of costs. It cannot fund statutory or mandatory legal requirements, vessel purchases, capacity-increasing fishing investments, exploratory fishing, pulse trawling, the transfer of a business or fishing vessel, routine maintenance, ordinary operating costs unless specifically allowed in the offer, interest and loan repayments, duplicated grant costs, insurance-recoverable costs, or items bought before MMO acknowledges receipt of the application. Consumable office equipment, phones, laptops and subscription services are also listed as ineligible, and application-preparation costs cannot be claimed.
These exclusions are practical warnings. Before requesting a quote, check whether the purchase is genuinely project-specific and whether the proposed specification could be interpreted as increasing fishing capacity. Keep a separate cost schedule for eligible and ineligible items. Do not sign a supplier order simply because the application is nearly ready: the timing of the purchase can determine whether the cost is claimable.
Application process and required materials
Every applicant should read the FaSS general guidance together with the detailed guidance for the chosen project type. The online application is submitted through the FaSS e-system. MMO also offers an optional expression of interest for applicants who are unsure whether a project meets the scheme criteria. An EOI is not a substitute for the grant application, but it can be useful for testing basic eligibility before investing in a full proposal.
The application asks for business or organisation details, including accounts, business registration information and VAT registration information where relevant. The appropriate application guide and the project-specific guidance will identify the full supporting-document set. Larger funding-round applications require a business case, and MMO’s funding-round guidance says that applicants should contact the Grants Team for the appropriate template.
Prepare the following working file before opening the form:
- a one-page problem and project summary;
- a measure-by-measure eligibility map;
- a detailed budget with quotes and match-funding sources;
- a cash-flow showing how the project will be paid up front;
- a delivery timetable and responsibility matrix;
- baseline data and target indicators for each promised benefit;
- evidence of permissions, partnerships, ownership and compliance; and
- a risk register covering procurement, delivery, safety, environmental and reporting risks.
The applicant remains responsible for the truth and completeness of the application even if an agent or consultant helps prepare it. MMO says responsibility cannot be transferred to an adviser. Keep source documents, quotes, approvals and correspondence in a controlled project folder so that the same evidence can support the application, procurement and later claims.
What reviewers are likely to test
The published criteria point to four recurring questions. Is the project good value for money? Are the benefits specific, credible and relevant to the English fishing and seafood sector? Can the applicant afford and deliver it? And is the proposal legally and technically compliant?
Answer each question with evidence. Replace “this will create jobs” with a staffing plan, current recruitment evidence, the number and type of roles, and the mechanism by which the project creates or protects them. Replace “this will improve sustainability” with a measurable baseline, the intervention, the expected change and the monitoring method. Replace “the community supports this” with named partners, consultation evidence and a clear explanation of how the community benefits.
Do not hide dependencies. If planning permission, marine consent, vessel approval, land access, a supplier, or a research partner is essential, state its status. Reviewers can tolerate a dependency that is understood and managed; they have less confidence in a proposal that assumes every approval will arrive automatically.
Common mistakes to avoid
The most damaging mistake is treating FaSS as a generic capital grant. The project must have a clear and obvious link and benefit to the fishing and seafood sector in England. A good environmental idea without that link is not enough.
Another mistake is choosing the wrong measure. Read the detailed guidance for the activity before writing the narrative or building the budget. A project that includes training, infrastructure and marine restoration may need separate applications or careful advice on how its elements fit together.
Applicants also lose credibility by underestimating match funding and reimbursement timing. Show the full project cost, not just the grant request, and demonstrate the source of the applicant contribution. Avoid claiming costs that another grant, insurer or statutory budget already covers.
Finally, do not start too early, submit an incomplete application, or rely on a deadline copied from an old cycle. The published funding-round dates are current at the time of this page, but MMO may update its guidance. Check the official pages and contact the Grants Team before the relevant submission date.
Frequently asked questions
Is the 4 September 2026 deadline for every FaSS project?
No. It is the next listed submission date for the competitive funding-round route, which is for larger-value projects of £250,000 or more. Smaller projects use the ordinary FaSS application route. Confirm the correct route with MMO if your project is close to the threshold or includes multiple measures.
Can a university or research institute apply?
Yes. Universities and research institutes are listed among eligible applicant types. The project must still have a clear English fishing, aquaculture, seafood-processing or marine-environment connection and must fit an eligible measure.
Does the scheme pay the whole project cost?
Not generally. Match funding is required, and the applicable rate depends on the measure and current guidance. Applicants also need enough cash to pay project costs up front before claiming them back.
Can a new entrant apply for training?
Yes, the scheme names a new entrant to the industry or an unemployed individual who could benefit from knowledge or skills in fishing, aquaculture or processing. The request must be tied to an eligible activity and supported by a credible sector-benefit case.
Can I buy equipment before applying?
Do not assume so. MMO lists items purchased before it acknowledges receipt of the funding application as ineligible. Wait for the relevant acknowledgement and follow the project-specific rules before ordering.
What if I am not sure whether my idea qualifies?
Read the general and project-specific guidance, then consider submitting the optional expression of interest. You can also contact the MMO Grants Team at [email protected] or 0208 026 5539.
Official links and next steps
Begin with the official Fisheries and Seafood Scheme overview. Then read the FaSS general guidance and the 2026 funding-round dates and measures. Choose the detailed guidance for your project type before finalising the budget.
If you are considering a project of £250,000 or more, work backwards from 4 September 2026 and leave time for partner sign-off, quotes, match-funding evidence and a complete business case. If the proposal is not ready, the published 13 November 2026 round may be the more realistic target. For smaller projects, use the FaSS online application system and check whether an expression of interest would help clarify fit. Treat the official MMO pages and current guidance as the final authority on eligibility, costs, deadlines and application instructions.
