LPDP RISPRO International Collaboration (Historical Reference)
A verified reference guide to LPDP RISPRO Kolaborasi Internasional, covering its funding framework, researcher criteria, evidence of international partnership, and the checks needed before a future call can be submitted.
LPDP RISPRO International Collaboration (Historical Reference)
LPDP RISPRO Kolaborasi Internasional, usually shortened to RISPRO KI, is a research-funding scheme operated by Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP), the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education under the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. It is intended for strategic basic research carried out with an overseas research partner through a joint call, matching fund, or co-funding arrangement.
This page is a historical reference, not a claim that an application window is open. LPDP’s official RISPRO KI page is live and describes the scheme, its criteria, selection stages, funding ceiling, and eligible cost categories. It defines RISPRO KI as theme-based basic research conducted through a joint call, matching fund, or co-funding arrangement. However, the page does not publish a dated current call or a new application deadline. Its “Daftar” link opens eRISPRO, but a general registration link alone does not establish that a RISPRO KI call is accepting proposals. The last call deadline verified for this archive is 2020-06-25: the Universitas Gadjah Mada Directorate of Research notice records the 2020 RISPRO KI intake closing on that date. The date stays in the front matter as the archived round’s real deadline, not as a current submission date. The available evidence supports keeping the scheme’s reference information, but it does not confirm a new cycle or establish that applications are currently open.
Applicants should therefore wait for a new LPDP announcement or a named RISPRO partner to publish the next theme, timetable, and submission instructions. The standing framework below is useful for preparation, but it cannot substitute for the next call notice. A future call may narrow the subject area, change document requirements, appoint a different partner, or set different dates.
Verified program snapshot
| Item | Verified position |
|---|---|
| Program | RISPRO Kolaborasi Internasional (RISPRO KI) |
| Organisation | Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP), Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia |
| Current page status | LPDP’s official RISPRO KI page describes the scheme and links to eRISPRO, but does not publish a current call-specific deadline or establish an open registration period |
| Archive deadline | 2020-06-25, the closing date recorded in the Universitas Gadjah Mada Directorate of Research notice for the 2020 call |
| Funding ceiling | Up to IDR 2 billion per research title per year, or IDR 6 billion over three years |
| Maximum funding term | Three years, with a possible extension of up to three additional years under LPDP’s framework |
| Research partner | A researcher or research group at an overseas university or research and development institution, or a comparable body |
| Registration route | The official LPDP page links to eRISPRO at https://risprolpdp.kemenkeu.go.id/ |
| Selection | Administrative selection followed by substantive selection |
The word “historical” is important here. It does not mean that LPDP has publicly declared the scheme discontinued. LPDP’s official page still defines RISPRO KI and gives its standing requirements, but it does not include a new call notice or closing date. Readers should not treat the archived date as a new opportunity to submit. The page is kept available so research teams can understand the scheme and prepare evidence while waiting for a dated official call.
The archived 2020 call and its scope
The archived call documented here is the 2020 RISPRO-KI round. The Universitas Gadjah Mada Directorate of Research notice records that proposal intake ran through 2020-06-25 and links applicants to LPDP’s application information. Its call guide identified maritime affairs, health, and advanced materials and nanotechnology as that round’s themes. Those subjects are historical call details, not evidence that the same themes are open now. LPDP’s official RISPRO-KI page defines the scheme and publishes its standing rules, but gives no active call window or new closing date. LPDP’s general research-funding guidance describes the RISPRO mechanisms and directs readers to call-specific invitations or partner ministries for schedules; it does not give a new RISPRO-KI timetable. This supports keeping the page as an archive without claiming that LPDP has permanently discontinued the scheme.
The 2020 call guide described an Indonesian research group of at least three Indonesian citizens under an eligible Indonesian ministry or agency, local government, university, non-governmental organisation, or community organisation with a research or development body. The project also needed an overseas research partner from a university, research and development organisation, or similar institution. The standing LPDP criteria page continues to require a doctoral-level lead researcher who is not pursuing further study or certain other academic activities, a documented partner, one proposal per person per registration period, and a relevant preliminary study of at least three first-author Scopus Q2-or-higher articles. Teams should read any new call notice carefully because a future call can set a different theme, eligible applicant group, or documentary requirement.
What RISPRO KI funds
LPDP describes RISPRO KI as a basic-research scheme with a theme established by LPDP and delivered with an external party. The intended results are internationally credible research outputs, not merely an overseas visit or a general academic exchange. The official framework lists scientific articles, registered intellectual property, technology or product prototypes, and social-engineering models as possible outputs.
The publication requirements are demanding. The lead researcher is expected to have at least two scientific articles, as first author and/or corresponding author, accepted in highly reputable international journals indexed in Q1 of Scopus. The lead researcher must also have at least one accepted Q1 Scopus-indexed article co-authored with the research partner. These are program-level output requirements described by LPDP; the next call may provide more detailed timing, evidence, or monitoring rules.
The funding ceiling is a maximum, not an automatic award. LPDP states that a research title may receive up to IDR 2,000,000,000 per year and up to IDR 6,000,000,000 across a three-year period. The framework also says that funding can last up to three years and may be extended for up to another three years. A proposal should request only the amount that its work plan, personnel plan, partner responsibilities, and outputs can justify.
The cost structure matters when building a draft budget. At least 95% of the total should be direct costs, while indirect costs may account for no more than 5%. Direct personnel costs are capped at 30% of total RISPRO KI funding. LPDP lists personnel and administrator honoraria, consumables, references and data, laboratory equipment or testing services, training and seminars, domestic travel, field workers and experts, article registration, intellectual-property or standards administration, printing, and eligible international travel among the possible direct-cost categories.
International travel is not an unrestricted mobility allowance. LPDP’s framework limits it to a maximum of two trips per year and a total allocation of no more than IDR 250,000,000 per year. The listed purpose must be tied to research activity such as a focus group, capacity building, testing, survey, observation, seminar, or dissemination. The framework excludes land or property purchases, operational vehicles, construction of buildings or offices, guarantees and loans, cash grants to other parties or communities, and costs unrelated to the stated research outputs.
Eligibility checks before a future call
The first gate is the lead researcher. LPDP requires the RISPRO KI proposal to be led by a researcher with at least a doctoral degree. The lead must not be undertaking further study or another academic activity such as academic recharging or a postdoctoral program. This is not a formality: the lead is responsible for the research design, team coordination, reporting, and delivery of the outputs. A team should confirm the status of the proposed lead before drafting a full application.
The second gate is the overseas partner. LPDP defines the research partner as a researcher or research group from an overseas university, research and development institution, or similar entity. The partnership must be documented with a memorandum of understanding, cooperation agreement, or another relevant document. The scheme page does not publish a single mandatory template for this evidence, so teams should secure an institutional document that identifies both sides and makes the research relationship clear, then check the next call for any required form.
The third gate is the preliminary study. The proposed research must have a preliminary study consisting of at least three relevant scientific articles by the lead proposer as first author. LPDP’s page specifies that these articles must have been published in international journals indexed by Scopus at a minimum of Q2. Keep the article records ready: title, journal, DOI or stable identifier, Scopus status, publication date, and the paragraph or work package that each article supports. Do not assume that a large publication list can replace three relevant first-author studies.
The fourth gate is participation in only one proposal during a registration period. LPDP states that a RISPRO KI proposer, whether lead or member, may propose or register only one research proposal during a particular registration period. The team should therefore resolve overlapping roles before registration opens and keep a written record of each member’s proposal commitment.
Finally, check subject fit. RISPRO KI is theme-led. A strong project outside the theme can fail at administrative selection before reviewers examine its scientific quality. A group should not rely on the general RISPRO label alone; it must compare its research question and outputs with the specific theme and partner instructions in the next official announcement.
How the archived call worked and how to prepare for a future one
The archived deadline has passed and there is no verified current registration window. Do not submit against the archived date or assume the old portal instructions remain active. For the 2020 call, LPDP’s guide said registration could be online or offline as announced by LPDP or its RISPRO partner; the specific time and address were to be published with the opening notice. The archived call notice from Universitas Gadjah Mada’s Directorate of Research records intake through 2020-06-25. The guide required proposals to follow its supplied format. The named partner for that open call was Dana Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (DIPI), which supported proposal registration and selection as well as monitoring and evaluation under LPDP’s agreement.
The following steps are preparation checks only. A future announcement and its own templates, dates, partner instructions, and portal links must control any actual submission.
1. Confirm the announcement and partner
Start at the official LPDP RISPRO KI page and follow the linked eRISPRO route only after a dated announcement identifies the active theme, partner, registration window, and submission procedure. Save the announcement, guidelines, templates, and any amendment notice. Check whether the partner uses a separate portal or requires an initial expression of interest before the LPDP registration.
2. Test eligibility with documents in hand
Check the lead researcher’s doctorate and current academic status. Confirm that the overseas partner is eligible and that its institution can sign the required cooperation evidence. Map the three relevant Q2-or-higher Scopus articles that support the preliminary study. Track the separate Q1 accepted-publication requirements as expected program outputs, rather than treating them as an additional entry criterion. Also check that no proposed lead or member is committed to another RISPRO KI proposal in the same period.
3. Build the joint research plan
Write a concise research plan that links the problem, method, partner contribution, milestones, and outputs. The overseas partner should have a real work package, such as access to a facility or dataset, specialist methods, comparative fieldwork, validation, or joint analysis. State what each institution will provide in cash, staff time, facilities, data, or services. A signature without a defined contribution is weak collaboration evidence.
4. Prepare the budget against permitted costs
Create the budget from activities rather than from a desired total. Check the 95% direct-cost minimum, 5% indirect-cost maximum, 30% personnel ceiling, and the specific annual limit for international travel. Tie every major line to a milestone and output. Remove excluded items such as vehicles, buildings, land, loans, and unrelated cash assistance. Account for taxes and other applicable charges because LPDP states that the proposed amount must include them.
5. Assemble the submission package
Keep the proposal, CVs, publication evidence, institutional affiliation documents, partner agreement or letter, budget justification, work plan, data or ethics permissions, and any required declarations in the exact templates supplied by the call. Ask the research office to review institutional authority and signatures. Ask the partner to check the description of its role and the publication plan. If a required document is pending, identify that risk before registration rather than assuming it can be added later.
6. Submit through the named route and retain proof
When the call is open, complete the eRISPRO or partner registration exactly as instructed. Confirm that the proposal is attached to the correct scheme and theme, that the budget totals agree across files, and that the lead and members are entered consistently. Keep the submission receipt, timestamp, application number, and final uploaded files. LPDP’s framework describes administrative selection followed by substantive selection, so a technically strong proposal can still fail if the registration record or required documents are incomplete. For the archived call, the guide likewise set out administrative and substantive stages, with review of theme fit, proposer criteria, completeness, research quality, outputs, currency, and budget reasonableness.
Documents and proposal content
The official 2020 proposal template asked applicants to identify the project title, acronym, Indonesian principal investigator institution, overseas project partner, proposed start date, duration, investigators, institutions, and weekly effort. It called for a project description explaining fit with the theme, scientific and technological aims, novelty, added value of transnational cooperation, consortium strengths, interdisciplinary aspects, national priorities, and a self-assessment of the target technology readiness level. Its work plan section requested methodology, activities, task distribution, partner involvement, resource allocation, and project management. Other requested elements covered potential impact and exploitation, beneficiaries, communication and dissemination, annual research outputs, work breakdown, team member roles, and partner contribution.
The template also included annexes for human participation and animal research, as well as an institutional approval sheet signed by the principal investigator, partner representative, and institutional leadership. Those are verified features of the archived template; a future call may change them. Use them as a preparation inventory, not a promise that the next cycle will accept identical forms. Before any submission, obtain the current documents directly from LPDP or the partner named in its announcement, confirm which signatures and ethics approvals are required, and check how supporting publications and collaboration evidence must be uploaded.
Selection and decision guidance
LPDP says administrative selection checks theme alignment, proposer criteria, and document completeness. Substantive selection examines the quality of the proposer, research outputs, research novelty or currency, and budget reasonableness. At least three reviewers assess the substantive stage, and LPDP states that approval requires collective and collegial recommendations with a minimum score of 75% of the maximum.
That structure suggests three practical review questions. First, can an administrator verify every eligibility claim quickly? Second, can a subject reviewer see why the overseas partner is necessary rather than decorative? Third, does the budget make the proposed outputs more credible instead of simply making the request larger? Answer these questions before the next call appears.
For now, the correct action is monitoring and preparation. The official LPDP page and eRISPRO portal are the places to recheck for a new theme and dated call. Until LPDP publishes that information, this entry should be read as an archive of the verified scheme and its last located call deadline, not as an open application listing.