Rolling Grant

Thailand Community Forest Funding: How Registered Community Forests Actually Earn Money Through T-VER Carbon Credits

The Royal Forest Department runs no THB 24 million restoration grant. Registered community forests earn revenue through T-VER carbon credits, with 90 percent of credits going to the community forest committee.

JJ Ben-Joseph, founder of FindMyMoney.App
Reviewed by JJ Ben-Joseph
Official source: Royal Forest Department Thailand
💰 Funding No lump-sum grant: 90% of T-VER carbon credit revenue to the community forest committee, plus …
📅 Deadline Rolling or ongoing
📍 Location Thailand
🏛️ Source Royal Forest Department Thailand

Correction notice: an earlier version of this page described a “Thailand Community Forest Grants” programme worth up to ฿24,000,000 per community network, with an application deadline of 27 May 2025. No such programme exists. The Royal Forest Department (RFD) publishes no open call by that name, no award of that size, and no deadline on that date. The old page also pointed at the RFD homepage as its “application portal,” which is simply the Department’s front door. What follows is a rewrite around the mechanisms the Department actually operates. They do pay real money to community forests — just not as a lump-sum restoration grant.

What the Royal Forest Department Actually Runs

The unit you want is the Community Forest Management Bureau (สำนักจัดการป่าชุมชน) at forest.go.th/community. Its site carries news, administrative circulars, the national community forest database, and the annual “คนรักษ์ป่า ป่ารักชุมชน” award. It does not carry a grant call, a funding table, or a submission deadline, and it has not for as long as the page has existed in its current form.

The scale of what the Bureau oversees is not small. Government reporting on the Department’s FY2569 (2026) community forest agenda describes roughly 12,000 community forests covering about 7 million rai and serving more than 5 million households, framed under the slogan “Community Forest Based Wellness.” Separate 2026 reporting citing the Department puts the registered count at around 11,000 community forests over 6.24 million rai — roughly a million hectares — supporting about 4 million households, with the annual value of forest resources those households draw on estimated above 4 billion baht.

What the Department describes itself as providing is technical mentorship, not cash transfers: academic support, help adding value to forest products, and assistance getting community forests into carbon markets. If you arrived here expecting to write a proposal and receive ฿24 million, that expectation needs replacing with a different and slower plan. The good news is that the different plan is real, documented, and already paying communities.

Key Details at a Glance

DetailInformation
Administering bodyRoyal Forest Department, Community Forest Management Bureau
Legal basisCommunity Forest Act B.E. 2562 (2019)
Money mechanismT-VER carbon credit revenue, not a grant
Community share (community-led projects)90% of credits to the community forest committee, 10% to RFD
Community share (private-sector supported)40% community, 50% supporting sponsor, 10% RFD
Pending policy changeRFD’s 10% share to be released to communities, targeted for completion by September 2569 (2026)
Application windowNo fixed annual deadline; T-VER enrolment is rolling
Separate prize routeคนรักษ์ป่า ป่ารักชุมชน awards, up to ฿200,000 for the national winner
Official pagehttps://www.forest.go.th/community/

Route One: Carbon Credits Under T-VER

Thailand’s domestic voluntary carbon standard is T-VER — the Thailand Voluntary Emission Reduction Program — administered by the Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (TGO). Forestry activities eligible under it include planting, tending, conserving, and rehabilitating forest, which covers most of what a community forest committee already does.

The Department governs how the resulting credits are divided through its regulation on carbon credit sharing from planting, tending, conserving and rehabilitating forests in forest areas, issued in B.E. 2564 (2021). Two arrangements matter:

Community-led projects under the Community Forest Act route give the community forest management committee 90 percent of the credits, with the Department retaining 10 percent. This is the arrangement you want if your community can carry the registration and verification costs itself or with a non-commercial partner.

Sponsor-supported projects, where a private company funds the project work, split differently: roughly 40 percent to the community, 50 percent to the supporting company, and 10 percent to the Department. You give up credit share in exchange for someone else paying the up-front costs, which are not trivial.

Both splits are in motion. The Department has stated a policy intention to release its own 10 percent so that communities receive the full benefit, with the change expected to be completed by September 2569 (2026). Treat that as announced intent rather than settled regulation until you see it published — but it is the direction of travel, and it is worth asking your provincial office where the amendment stands before you sign anything.

The uptake numbers give you a realistic sense of pace. As reported in 2026, 326 community forests are enrolled across 71 T-VER projects, covering roughly 300,000 rai and producing more than 170,000 verified carbon credits. A further 262 community forests operate under sponsor-supported arrangements across more than 200,000 rai, generating over 100,000 credits, with backers including PTT. Against a base of 11,000-plus registered community forests, that is about three percent participation after several years. Enrolment is not a formality.

The precedent case is Baan Khong Tabang community forest in Tha Yang district, Phetchaburi — reported by the Seub Nakhasathien Foundation as Thailand’s first community forest to sell carbon credits. It registered under T-VER on 18 September 2015 and reached market on 24 December 2022, having accumulated 5,259 tonnes of CO₂ equivalent over roughly seven years. Read those two dates together. Seven years of sequestration, and seven years between registration and first sale. Any plan that assumes carbon revenue inside three years is not grounded in what has actually happened.

The Department’s T-VER application portal sits at fp.forest.go.th/rfd_app/t_ver/, and it publishes an operations manual for requesting participation. As of this writing the portal itself carries a notice that it is being revised to align with new regulations, so confirm current procedure by phone rather than assuming the posted forms are the live ones. The Forest Research and Development Division handles these enquiries on 0 2561 4292-3, extension 5030.

Route Two: The Mae Fah Luang Foundation Programme

If your community cannot fund registration and verification alone, the most established intermediary is the Mae Fah Luang Foundation’s “Carbon Credit from Community Forests for Sustainability” programme, documented at maefahluang.org.

It is a public-private arrangement: the Foundation implements, with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, the Royal Forest Department and TGO on the government side, and Siam Commercial Bank, QTC Energy, TMT Steel, PricewaterhouseCoopers ABAS, Intouch Holdings and the Securities and Exchange Commission among the corporate participants. Companies fund forest protection and community development budgets; in return they receive credits against their own emissions.

Running since 2021, the programme covered 120 communities across 10 provinces — Chiang Rai, Chiang Mai, Phayao, Lampang, Mae Hong Son, Kamphaeng Phet, Uthai Thani, Yasothon, Amnat Charoen and Krabi — spanning more than 23,526 hectares as of 2023, and had generated roughly US$2,112,000 in additional community income.

Divide that figure by 120 communities and several years and you get a per-community annual number in the low thousands of dollars. That is meaningful money for a village fund, patrol allowances, nursery costs or a firebreak crew. It is not ฿24 million, and it is not a substitute for a capital budget. The Foundation’s page does not publish an open enrolment window or a deadline, so approach is by contact rather than by application form.

Route Three: Award Money You Can Actually Compete For

The one route with a published deadline pattern and a published prize schedule is the “คนรักษ์ป่า ป่ารักชุมชน” award, co-run by the Royal Forest Department and RATCH Group. The Community Forest Management Bureau’s site lists it for the 2568–2569 cycle.

For year 18 (2568/2025), reporting on the launch described 16 awards worth about 1.4 million baht in total: one national champion at ฿200,000 plus the royal trophy, three national runners-up at ฿150,000 each, four regional champions at ฿100,000, four regional runners-up at ฿50,000, and four disaster-resilience awards at ฿50,000. That round’s registration ran from 6 February to 31 March 2568 (2025). The theme that year was natural disaster risk management, tied to national carbon neutrality goals.

The Department has not published the year-19 window at the time of writing. If the pattern holds, watch forest.go.th and ratch.co.th from January onward, and confirm with the Community Forest Management Bureau on 0-2561-4292-3, extension 5654. Judging weighs forest condition and biodiversity, genuinely participatory management, and a conservation plan that treats use as sustainable rather than prohibited.

Step Zero: Registration Under the Community Forest Act

Everything above is gated on one thing: your community forest must be registered with the Royal Forest Department under the Community Forest Act B.E. 2562. Registration establishes the community forest management committee as the legal body that can hold a T-VER agreement and receive credit revenue. Without it, there is no counterparty for the Department to pay.

Registration involves defining and mapping the boundary, constituting the committee, preparing a management plan, and getting the provincial community forest committee’s approval. Your district and provincial forestry offices run this process, and it is the single most productive thing to do if you are not yet registered. Timelines vary by province and by how contested the boundary is; budget in months, not weeks.

If you are already registered, the next practical step is a baseline carbon assessment: what is standing on your land now, what species, what size distribution, and how much it is likely to add per year. That number determines whether a T-VER project is worth the transaction cost or whether you would spend more on verification than the credits will return.

What to Be Careful About

Thai civil society coverage of forest carbon has raised real concerns worth understanding before you commit. The central criticism is that credit-generating arrangements can shift decision-making about a community’s own forest toward the sponsoring company and the certification schedule, and that the community’s share of the value can be modest relative to what the credit is eventually sold for. Communities have also found that carbon accounting obligations constrain customary use — what you may cut, gather, or burn — for the duration of the crediting period, which can run for decades.

None of that makes the mechanism a bad deal. It makes it a contract. Read the credit-sharing terms, the project duration, the permanence obligations, and the exit provisions with the same care you would give a land agreement, because functionally that is what it is. Ask specifically what happens if a fire or a storm reverses part of the sequestration, and who bears that liability.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there any ฿24 million grant? No. No Royal Forest Department source publishes a per-network award of that size, and no call by that name exists.

Can we apply if we are not yet registered? Not for carbon credits. Registration under the Community Forest Act B.E. 2562 is the precondition. Start there with your district forestry office.

How long until credits produce revenue? The first community forest to reach market took seven years from T-VER registration to first sale. Plan on a similar horizon and fund your restoration work from other sources in the meantime.

Do we get 90 percent or 40 percent? It depends which route you take. Community-led projects give the committee 90 percent; sponsor-funded projects give the community about 40 percent, with 50 percent to the sponsor. The Department’s own 10 percent may be released to communities in both cases, with completion targeted for September 2569 (2026).

Is there a deadline? Not for T-VER enrolment, which is rolling. The award programme has run a February-to-March registration window in past years; confirm the current cycle with the Bureau.

Who pays for verification? In sponsor-supported projects, the sponsor. In community-led projects, the committee or a partner such as the Mae Fah Luang Foundation. This cost is the main reason enrolment is low relative to the number of registered community forests.

How to Proceed

Confirm your registration status with your district forestry office and get a copy of the registration record. Ask the provincial office which T-VER projects already operate in your province and whether an existing project is accepting additional community forests, since joining a running project is substantially cheaper than starting one.

Then contact the Community Forest Management Bureau at forest.go.th/community about current procedure, and the Forest Research and Development Division on 0 2561 4292-3 extension 5030 specifically about T-VER participation and the status of the credit-sharing amendment. If you want an intermediary that has done this at scale, approach the Mae Fah Luang Foundation through maefahluang.org.

Finally, watch the Bureau’s news page from January for the next round of the คนรักษ์ป่า ป่ารักชุมชน award. It is the only route here that pays cash on a published schedule, and ฿50,000 to ฿200,000 arriving this year is worth more to most village funds than carbon revenue arriving in 2033.

Next step
Apply Now